Think again about the work we saw at OMA today and consider the paragraph in Chapter One of Danto's "The End of Art" which begins halfway down on page 13. It starts, "The sixties was a paroxysm of styles..." and ends with "You had, in brief, to turn to philosophy."
1. Can you think of any of the objects in OMA that could be used as an example of what art is? Could it be the ONLY example? Why or why not?
2. If postmodernism means that you cannot teach the meaning of art by example, as Danto claims, how do you teach it? By what means?
We will share our answers in class on Monday. Please complete two journal pages on this post.
On this blog, we will explore several major aesthetic theories from realism to postmodernism and engage in a dialogue about the very nature of art. Key contemporary artists will be explored in depth as each theory is unpacked and examined. Each response should be between 150-250 words in length. These are due on the date listed at the top of each entry,
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Monday, October 10, 2011
Diana Folsom Class Visit
What engaged your attention/imagination most actively during Diana Folsom's class visit last week? Was it the mention of "California Flow Painting," or Jorge Pardo's gallery designs for LACMA? Were you intrigued by the intersection of Formalism and Expressionism in Ms. Folsom's work? Or was it the feedback she gave you on your visual journal that was most engaging?
This blog post is due Wednesday, October 12th by noon. Journal entry for this post will be reviewed on November 2nd.
This blog post is due Wednesday, October 12th by noon. Journal entry for this post will be reviewed on November 2nd.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)